Desentralisasi dan Ketimpangan Pembangunan Antar Daerah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37481/sjr.v8i1.1053Keywords:
Decentralization, Regional Development, InequalityAbstract
This study aims to analyze the role of decentralization in promoting regional development and reducing interregional inequality. The research employs a qualitative descriptive approach by analyzing secondary data and reviewing relevant literature to identify factors affecting the effectiveness of decentralization. The results reveal that although decentralization has enhanced regional autonomy and development capacity, its impact on reducing inequality remains limited. Findings indicate that discrepancies in fiscal capacity, uneven infrastructure distribution, and varying quality of human resources are major obstacles to balanced development. In brief, while decentralization contributes positively to regional development, integrated efforts such as capacity building, infrastructure improvement, and targeted fiscal policies are necessary to significantly reduce inequality.
References
Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). Diakses pada tanggal 14 Februari 2025. https://www.bps.go.id/
Cheema, G. S., & Rondinelli, D. A. (1983). Decentralization and Development: Policy Implementation in Developing Countries. Sage Publications.
Gratia, Y. C., & Nugroho, S. B. M. (2021). Analisis Ketimpangan Antar Wilayah Di 35 Kabupaten/Kota Di Provinsi Jawa Tengah Dan Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya. Diponegoro Journal of Economics, 9(2), 31-40.
Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat (PUPR). Diakses pada tanggal 14 Februari 2025. https://www.pu.go.id/
Lathifah, H., Frinaldi, A., Magriasti, L., & Naldi, H. (2024). Transformasi Kebijakan Desentralisasi Di Indonesia Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Stabilitas Pemerintahan Daerah Di Era Globalisasi. Professional: Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Administrasi Publik, 11(2), 577-584.
Moleong, L. J. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Murad, A. H. M. A. D. (2019). Desentralisasi Fiskal Dan Inklusifitas Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Dikabupaten/Kota Di Ntb. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Syariah-ALIANSI, 3(2), 129-157.
Myrdal, G. (1957). Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions. Gerald Duckworth & Co Ltd.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Addison-Wesley.
Rachmad, A. F., Azaria, E., Xusan, Q. N., & Azzahra, N. (2023). Pengaruh Kebijakan Desentralisasi Terhadap Peningkatan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Daerah. Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum, 16(02), 75-88.
Rifqah, N. (2017). Analisis Ketimpangan Pembangunan Antar Wilayah Kabupaten/Kota di Provinsi Sumatera Barat. Ecosains: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi dan Pembangunan, 6(2), 91-102.
Santi, S. D., & Iskandar, D. A. (2021). Kebijakan desentralisasi dan ketimpangan capaian pembangunan wilayah di Indonesia. Jurnal Syntax Admiration, 2(3), 490-506.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.
Smith, B. C. (1985). Decentralization: The Territorial Dimension of the State. George Allen & Unwin.
Suriadi, H., Frinaldi, A., Magriasti, L., & Yandri, L. (2024). Desentralisasi Dan Upaya Peningkatan Otonomi Daerah: Menuju Pembangunan Berkelanjutan Di Indonesia. Menara Ilmu: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Kajian Ilmiah, 18(1).
Tarigan, R. (2005). Ekonomi Regional: Teori dan Aplikasi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Todaro, M. P. (2000). Economic Development. Addison-Wesley.
Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.
Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2004 tentang Sistem Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional.
Williamson, J. G. (1965). Regional Inequality and the Process of National Development: A Description of the Patterns. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 13(4), 3-45.
